The penalty landscape
is not theoretical.
Hover each card to reveal the regulatory framework and enforcement mechanism behind every number.
Ford. Transit Connect. One wrong HTS code.
The US government billed Ford $365 million for misclassifying Transit Connect vans under an incorrect Harmonized Tariff Schedule code.
Negligent misclassification: 5–20% of merchandise value. Gross negligence: 25–40%. Fraud: up to 80%. Retroactive enforcement up to 5 years.
Defense-grade exposure hiding in commercial components.
TE Connectivity paid $5.8M for shipping wires and PCB connectors to Chinese parties linked to hypersonics and unmanned aerial vehicles.
Civil fines up to $1,271,078 per violation or twice the transaction value, whichever is greater. Plus 20 years imprisonment per count.
Your EU customers cannot wait for you to figure out CBAM.
CBAM applies to cement, steel, aluminium, fertilisers, electricity, and hydrogen. Non-cooperative suppliers face demand shift — customers have no choice.
Failure to comply results in loss of EU market access. The new threshold exempts 90% of importers while covering 99% of emissions.
Hard drives. China. $300 million.
BIS imposed a $300M civil penalty against Seagate for exporting hard disk drives to Huawei. 3D Systems settled for $20M for ITAR violations.
Organizations fall under ITAR or EAR without realizing it. The exposure is not limited to final exports — controlled technical data carries risk from concept to delivery.
Misclassification costs money in both directions.
A 2023 Customs Audit Review found 18% of importers overpaid duties by misapplying HTS codes for industrial machinery.
Proactive classification audits recover overpayments and establish the documented compliance posture that mitigates future penalty exposure.
Sterling Footwear. $1.6M penalty. $20M more looming.
A routine HTS decision about shoe classifications spiraled into a $1.6M penalty with $20M in additional fines — not fraud, a technical misstep.
Shipment delays, fines, liquidation, and other penalties. The operational disruption compounds the financial exposure at every stage.
"We had no idea our fasteners were ITAR-controlled. Tariff found 23 items in our catalog that required export authorization we'd never filed. The audit was scheduled for six weeks later."
Chaos made legible.
Risk made manageable.
Every card is a closed engagement. Real frameworks, real outcomes, real numbers.
Midwest manufacturer. 143 misclassifications. Zero penalties.
A Tier 2 auto parts manufacturer exporting to 6 new markets had accumulated 143 HTS classification errors across their product catalog.
All 143 classifications corrected. Prior Disclosure accepted. No civil penalties assessed. $1.2M in overpaid duties recovered.
17 markets. 90 days. Full EAR authorization.
A defense-adjacent technology firm needed to expand into 17 countries with dual-use components on the Commerce Control List.
All 17 destinations cleared. License exemptions documented for 14. Two BIS licenses obtained in 38 days. One market deprioritized based on risk profile.
ITAR audit. Defense contractor. Clean result.
A precision machining firm producing components for defense primes had never formalized their ITAR compliance program despite 12 years of controlled exports.
Passed DDTC audit with no findings. Compliance program certified. $4.2M in estimated penalty exposure eliminated. Contract renewals secured.
Steel exporter. EU customers. CBAM deadline met.
A US steel mill exporting to 8 EU distributors faced CBAM reporting requirements they discovered 4 months before the real-data deadline.
All 8 EU distributors retained. Real emissions data submitted on schedule. Zero demand shift from non-compliance. Market expansion to 3 additional EU customers initiated.
3,200 transactions screened. Zero seizures.
An e-commerce brand scaling into MENA and Southeast Asia needed ongoing sanctions screening across a high-volume, mixed-origin product catalog.
3,200 transactions processed across 14 months. Zero seizures. Zero OFAC inquiries. Two high-risk consignees proactively flagged and removed from distribution.
Free Trade Agreement benefits left unclaimed. Not anymore.
A consumer electronics importer was paying full MFN duty rates on $47M in annual imports despite qualifying for USMCA preferential treatment.
$2.8M in annual duty savings recovered. Retroactive refund claim filed for 3 prior years. Full USMCA compliance documentation on file.
"The CBAM deadline came up in a quarterly review and none of us knew what it meant for our EU steel contracts. Within two weeks, Tariff had our emissions methodology documented and our distributors reassured."
Request a Compliance Assessment
Tell us your trade corridors and primary concern. We respond within one business day with a preliminary risk summary — no commitment required.
2026 TARIFF RISK MATRIX
HTS penalty exposure by industry sector, ITAR trigger checklist, CBAM readiness scorecard, and sanctions red-flag indicators — compiled from 2024–2025 enforcement data.
Request Compliance Assessment →
No retainer required for initial assessment.